Doug T.
Lifetime Member
Pettin' The Gator
Posts: 1,199
|
Post by Doug T. on Aug 7, 2014 9:48:15 GMT -5
I had a Polaroid of some sort, I think it was 640 x 320, that was back in the 90's. My next was a Fuji FinePix S5200 which I use extensively, I haven't used any film since then. Most of the photos I've posted here were taken with it. Now that I've got a new job, I haven't had much time to get it out. I would love to have a Canon RC250, in white
|
|
jpp
Contributing Member
Posts: 47
|
Post by jpp on Aug 8, 2014 14:37:05 GMT -5
My first camera was a Pana LC40, great lens, fast but poor screen,then another great lens on my FZ20 which gave me more than 60 000 pics before going nuts, now a G2 with 14-140, not so great a lens but a good camera.
|
|
|
Post by dee on Sept 1, 2014 10:54:37 GMT -5
My first Digi-box was a Canon G2,refurb,when the G3 arrived. I took it London a year or two ago, and was surprised at the quality.
|
|
|
Post by julio1fer on Sept 7, 2014 19:06:51 GMT -5
I am a late adopter. My first digital camera was a small Agfa ePhoto CL18, back in 1999. 640 x 480. Internal memory 2 MB. Not a serious camera, but it showed what was coming. Later on, in 2003, I switched to a more serious Olympus Camedia P&S, which is still in use in the family.
|
|
|
Post by philbirch on Sept 7, 2014 19:17:48 GMT -5
1999 isn't late by any stretch of the imagination. 2003 is still early days for digital. Cameras were still quite expensive then and the supermarkets still had shelves of film
|
|
|
Post by Peltigera on Sept 8, 2014 9:43:31 GMT -5
I went digital in 2004 when Bestbeloved bought me a Minolta Dimage Z1 with 3.2 megapixels.The quality was very good. Dinas nature reserve, Pembrockeshire Blackpool Mill, Pembrockeshire Sanna Cove, Ardnamurchan
|
|
|
Post by philbirch on Sept 8, 2014 10:41:52 GMT -5
Lovely photos, that's the most important part. Cameras then didn't have the ridiculous pixel density that there is now, so not as much noise (all things being equal of course)
|
|