Post by Stephen on May 15, 2013 12:32:53 GMT -5
Well done, the shots look good, overlap is always an issue with what becomes an un-sprocketed film in the camera. The lens looks in very good order for sharpness and contrast. The Vito was not supplied with an 828 back as far as I know, it was mentioned though, by a online collector. The spacing is as usual with 35mm with sprocketed film, as long as the transport is working.
In theory a hole in the back would allow 828 to be used.
The shots can easily be touched up in any graphics program to remove the edges and tidy up. At least the basic frame size is the usual 24x36, other sizes really confuse modern processors. Odd frame sizes on 35mm were the favourites of the Japanese makers in the 30's and 40's.
The Periflex has the same troubles with spacing, but even more so, as the spacing alters throughout the whole 35mm film! Any problems with the Vito are slippage by the film on the micro knurled roller.
Stephen.
In theory a hole in the back would allow 828 to be used.
The shots can easily be touched up in any graphics program to remove the edges and tidy up. At least the basic frame size is the usual 24x36, other sizes really confuse modern processors. Odd frame sizes on 35mm were the favourites of the Japanese makers in the 30's and 40's.
The Periflex has the same troubles with spacing, but even more so, as the spacing alters throughout the whole 35mm film! Any problems with the Vito are slippage by the film on the micro knurled roller.
Stephen.