Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 22, 2012 20:46:27 GMT -5
She is actually still alive ... she just also forgot, how to do it
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 22, 2012 19:53:22 GMT -5
Oh, there are nice and simple apps for MAC users as well. I can recommend Aperture: www.apple.com/aperture/ Very easy to use and reduced to what photographers need. Photoshop and Gimp have been too complicated for me ... or I might have been just too lazy getting into it I like simplicity.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 22, 2012 19:43:38 GMT -5
I noticed myself too ... if you don't unpack things immediately, it will never happen If these boxes are containing just a part of your collection, you need a bigger house indeed Regarding life in the city/countryside: I think, it all depends on where you grew up. People growing up in a city are always dreaming of a life in the countryside, but in the end, they get bored soon and start missing the convenience of a city life, but if you grew up in the countryside, you can become used to it again, I think. I am living in the biggest city on earth and believe me, there are many moments, when I just want to get out of it. Noisy, narrow, hectic ... but still, I can't imagine to live in the countryside. It works for a holiday to relax, but after that, I start missing Tokyo soon The statistics ( at least here in Japan ) tells the same thing. More then 90 percent of all people, moving to the countryside when getting retired return to the city within one year. It's also the missing convenience when aging. No hospital around the corner, events, friends, etc. or getting just some food when being sick. But saying all that, I hope, you will be happy in your new home. I know Austria and it is beautiful. Wouldn't like to live in a city there too !!!
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 22, 2012 10:51:52 GMT -5
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 22, 2012 5:14:57 GMT -5
Hahaha ... and yeah, I am pretty sure, that it would take quite a few meters of film to "sacrifice" for getting better results than the pro-lab. It is also about using always the same film type, I think ( but of course, I might be wrong, because I don't know ). Checking some recipes for B/W films, they are always slightly different and also the chemicals. Buying all this stuff would just make sense, if someone would focus on just one favorite film type. BTW, Mickey ... there are also a thousand ways of baking the same cake I remember, that I have been searching for a recipe of "Vanillekipferl", a very tasty Christmas cookie, my mother always used to make. You can find so many via Google, all different ... and worse of all, none of them tasting like my mothers yet www.google.co.jp/search?q=vanillekipferl&hl=de&safe=off&prmd=imvnse&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=FI9dUJOgNu3ImAXasoDoBw&sqi=2&ved=0CDMQsAQ&biw=1437&bih=1082
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 22, 2012 4:57:10 GMT -5
You can also give the camera a first try by using photo paper ( with the wooden plate holders ). I did that with my large format camera. A simple and efficient way for a first test. The ASA of photo paper should be around 12.5, still good enough for daylight if the objects are not moving.
Another idea ... but frankly speaking, I never tried it and would like to know myself if and how it works ... instant film ( like polaroid ). That would probably be the simplest solution at all.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 22, 2012 2:23:45 GMT -5
The mirror IS the shutter ? And no light leaking in ? Then, it is already a masterpiece of engineering with just one shutter speed
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 21, 2012 19:32:25 GMT -5
Interesting find Yes and No. Kill me for what I say, but 1/125 sec is mostly enough. If you have a variety of apertures, you can basically live with just 1/125 sec and B very well. Where is the shutter of this one BTW ? A leaf shutter, built in the lens ? A focal plane shutter in the body ?
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 21, 2012 9:31:40 GMT -5
I started with a similar idea. Not exactly from each decade but of all types. TLRs, SLRs, viewfinders, rangefinders, 35 mm, medium and large format, folders, and so forth. On the way, you also might find special brands or types, which you like and want to have other models of. To limit the frustration, I would try to fall in love with smaller brands though, better than starting to collect all Canons or Leicas. Welcome to the club ;D
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 21, 2012 9:20:06 GMT -5
An iPhone would be an option too. I don't own one, but looking around, most people do meanwhile. The light meter app on it is more than excellent. You can point with your finger on any area of your picture and get detailed readings. A lot more fancy features ... and well, as most people carry a cellphone in their pocket anyway, an extra light meter wouldn't be needed.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 18, 2012 5:41:25 GMT -5
No QL here, just the original Canonet. Excellent camera BTW, with which I took all my pictures on my trip to Europe last year ... and no batteries, as I like it Canonet 1961 by bokuwanihongasuki, on Flickr
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 18, 2012 3:36:46 GMT -5
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 17, 2012 19:45:11 GMT -5
If it is so easy, then why do professional labs not get it done properly ? I thought about starting to develop film by myself ... but ... first of all, I love to experiment with a lot of different film types. Wouldn't be worth, buying all the chemicals for each, I guess. Second, I do not have any experience. I checked some information about it in the internet, but everybody seems to have his own method and recipe ( even using coffee and stuff ) ... I actually do not want to get that deep into it. And back to the first point. The development of a B/W film costs about $3 here. Turning my bathroom into chemistry lab for that ... mmmmh ... and I also use mostly 120 film. I heard, that it needs some additional experience and skills, processing those in standard film tanks ... but those are just 2nd hand information. I never tried it myself.
That's actually a good idea. I'll do that !!!
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 16, 2012 10:36:23 GMT -5
Thanks for the review on an interesting camera ... and I like the pictures of the swans in particular.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Sept 16, 2012 10:18:03 GMT -5
Beautiful Stephen. Those pictures do have a depth of colors and bokeh, which is unknown to most people nowadays. In this case, I like the japanese language very much, which would call it "aji" = taste. This word is used for dishes and pictures as well.
|
|