Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 13, 2012 9:38:05 GMT -5
Thanks Orlin, but ... ... how do I do that ? The only way to open a 35 mm canister, I could find in the internet is ... breaking it. So it can't be used anymore However, it seems that there are special refillable 35 mm film canister, but I couldn't find any supplier for getting them. An actually much easier way would be, cutting the film of and tape it again to the end on the canister ( and then rewinding it in again ), but I don't know if this method would damage the machines, which they are using in this photo shops for processing. Today, I asked at all big camera stores in Tokyo ... no canister, no developing It seems, that they all use the same technology/machines. Only once, my film was broken ( the perforation got ripped into pieces, because the camera didn't work well ) and the lab developed it on request ( obviously by hand then ). It was more expensive than the camera though
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 12, 2012 19:06:25 GMT -5
But isn't it so, that the backing paper is only fixed on one side of the film ? So, 120/620 cameras are actually not made for rewinding the film. But just from logic ( I never tried it by myself yet though ), spooling the film from 120 to 620 means, spooling it twice. Once on what spool, you like and then once more on a 620 spool while making sure, that the backing paper gets spooled with it. That shouldn't be difficult by hand ... but with a camera ? How can you make sure, that the backing paper get's grabbed too ? No matter wether you spool the film once or twice, you should have this problem either while spooling the film twice or inserting it into a 620 camera later. I have a 620 camera ... but unfortunately, I couldn't manage to find empty 620 spools yet Just tried this spooling technique with an old 120 film for fun and it seems to be easy, doing it by hand. The Kodak No.2 Folding Autographic Brownie should be another camera, that can take both, 120 and 620 film. The film chamber is even big enough for taking 35 mm film cartridges. I want to try that some day. The pictures should look similar to the ones, taken with the "Sprocket Rocket" then: www.lomography.com/photos/cameras/3328515-lomography-sprocket-rocket/popularInteresting effect, isn't it. What kept me away from trying that is the fact. that I couldn't manage to handle the No.2 Autographic Brownie properly yet. The focus is so damn difficult to set on that one. I took a lot of test shots and I couldn't even figure out, where the focus exactly is, also trying to fix the lens with a jammed chop stick ... but it's like trying to cut onions with an ax. What would probably help is, closing the lens completely down and shooting at f:64 or something like that, but then, I would need a speedy film, which looks pretty grainy on 35 mm. Well ... and the 1/50 sec isn't really exciting too. I would just be able to shoot people, if they freeze
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 12, 2012 8:21:30 GMT -5
Mickey, it's probably the same in the biggest city or in the smallest town ... everything is possible, if you pay an "exclusice price" for it. In general, the tendency goes more into the direction "standard and mass production" ... everywhere. I don't know, if it is just my feeling, but it gets tougher and tougher to get something, that is just slightly different from what is "standard". And especially here in Japan, the "flexibility" is famous. No exceptions from the rules. People prefer to spend half an hour to apologize for the impossibility of something over deflecting just slightly from what supposes to me "normal". One of the million funny ( and true ) stories, I could tell: A friend of mine is always eating Spaghetti at his regular haunt. He tried to order a slice of lemon for it for three years ... and the waiter always apologized and refused. One day, he ordered a Coke and in there, there was a slice of lemon. He asked, if he can have two and the waiter said "of course" ... but with the Spaghetti, it has been impossible ... hahaha ... believe me, I make similar experiences just every day
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 12, 2012 1:50:00 GMT -5
Thanks to Curt's hint, I could find this picture ... www.cameraguild.jp/nekosan/december.htm... showing a lot of different Museflexes. Mine should be second from left. I will use this picture as a template for refurbishment. The good news are: Shutter is still working and the lenses are clean like new. So, it just needs some refurbishment from outside. Definitely want to use it ( even just once for a try ). 828, Bolta film ( never heard of that before ) ... 35 mm should work as well. Just ... how do I get it developed then I just asked in a photo shop in the neighbourhood. They develop 35 mm film by themselves, but they only accept it within the standard canister/container because its an automatized process. Any ideas on that ? Except the glorious idea of starting to develope film by myself
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 12, 2012 0:25:50 GMT -5
Wow ... Curt ... you are THE camera archaeologist !!! Museflex ... the description fits. Is there a picture shown in this Collector's Guide ? I could only find one picture of a Museflex in the internet. The camera there looks different from mine, but it might be a different model, I guess. www.cameraguild.jp/nekosan/muse.htmThe Museflex IIa, which is shown there, seems to have the lenses coupled, but mine has a fixed focus viewing lens, same as in the desription, you found. Thanks a lot, Curt. You are genius !!!
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 11, 2012 18:54:24 GMT -5
Thanks for the link, Curt !!! I know Barry ( the owner of this TLR homepage ) and of course, I contacted him as well. He's a kind guy, but he said, that he also has no idea and couldn't find any reference to this camera. Must be something very rare, he wrote.
Very mysterious. It's an amazingly detailed designed camera, having all features of a normal TLR ( so not just a toy camera ). All made from metal, but like a miniature ( the camera has the size of a pack of cigarettes ). So, somebody must have put some effort in designing and manufacturing it.
I also searched the japanese net by using keywords in japanese letters ( people are still not using our alphabet even for non-japanese words ). There are a lot of camera maniacs here, writting blogs about everything ... but no hint.
Barry also said, that the name of the camera/maker doesn't need to be "Meica" as well ( just the lens ), because there might have been a name plate on the camera, which could be missing now.
How little we know sometimes. Same as for my three large format cameras. The maker must be "Hansa", but there can be nothing found about that this company produced large format cameras ever.
There seem to be still a few "empty spaces" in camera history.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 11, 2012 4:40:58 GMT -5
That could be, Mickey. There has been a film still in this camera ( or better, the backing paper of it ) and as I researched a little bit, it should have been the film on the attached picture.
I am very excited about trying this weird little TLR ( probably I try to re-spool 35 mm film for that then ) ... and I would really like to know, what camera it is and when it has been made.
The only thing, I could find is, that the maker "Meica" obviously manufactured a toy camera in the 60s, but it looks completely different from mine.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 11, 2012 2:32:41 GMT -5
I got a pretty strange TLR from an auction today and wonder, if anybody has more information. It suppose to be a "Special MEICA" ( that's what is written on it ) and it's obviously taking 24x24 mm pictures on roll film ( not 126 or 35 mm cartridges, film like 120 on two film spools, just smaller ). There has been a film inserted, that's why I know it ... but I have never seen such a film type yet. I also can't find anything in the internet about this camera and even the almighty camerapedia keeps its silence Any ideas ? It looks horrible on the picture ( not refurbished yet ), but seems to work still. Berndt
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 10, 2012 2:51:10 GMT -5
My first 35 mm camera ? An unkown brand plastic camera, my grandfather gave to me as a present, when I was about 13 ? ... maybe. No light meter, no range finder ... aperture, shutter time, focus ... everything fully manual, just by guess. My grandfather said, that's the tool, you can learn photography with. And indeed ... after a little paractise, my success rate was pretty high and I could take great pictures with it. Honestly speaking, I have been much better in guessing light and distances at that time then I am now. The camera does not exist anymore, but I actually used it for years ... until I bought a russian Zenit SLR on a holiday in Prague. Still communism at that time there and the exchange rate for money at the black market has been just wonderful So, I could afford such a camera even still being a student. That should have happend in the middle of the 80s.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 9, 2012 18:41:22 GMT -5
Thanks Mickey !!!
So, you think, there have been two different models ... or exchangeable front elements ? I actually can't imagine any logical reason, why they should have manufactured a front element like this ( where the lens can't be exchanged ), because customers might want to buy the tele lens later as well ( and my granpa obviously did so too ). Sad, that I can't ask him anymore. He died 20 years ago.
In this construction, the lens can't be removed ... except maybe by removing those two srews and the whole front element, which I didn't try yet.
Or ... doesn't it actually look more like a Contina-matic II ?
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 9, 2012 9:22:13 GMT -5
Visiting my parents home in Germany for the first time since living in Japan for five years this summer, I found an old Zeiss camera of my grandfather in the attic. According to the almighty Camerapedia, it should be a Contina III, because it has a Pantar 45mm/2.8 lens and a light meter ... but ... there is no chance for exchanging lenses on it, which suppose to be possible on that model. camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/ContinaThe actually weird thing is, that my grandfather obviously owned a tele lens, which would fit to this camera type. It's a Kodak Retina-Tele-Xenar 135 mm f/4 ... in "like new" condition BTW, same as the camera. My grandfather had been crazy about keeping things in good condition as I remember him. The whole thing keeps me wondering all the time. Is it a Contina III ? Has there been a version of this model without exchangeable lenses ? And why should my grandfather have kept a tele lens for that camera then ? Any Zeiss experts, having an idea ? Zeiss Contina by bokuwanihongasuki, on Flickr
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 9, 2012 8:59:51 GMT -5
Lighter fluid ? Wow ... I need to try that.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 9, 2012 6:17:16 GMT -5
Oh ... and the Yen became strong ( even the japanese economy is seriously suffering from the earthquake disaster last year ). So, the prices I told, might "look" so high in US dollar now. Mmmmh ... basically I should buy all your cameras now and sell them in Japan ;D ... if I would be rich ... and interested in trading ... what I am unfortunately not
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 9, 2012 6:02:39 GMT -5
I shall no longer fret over the disabled old veterans on my shelves.
The Camera Collector is a great psychiatrist's couch. I think, am still lying on that couch sometimes ;D Especially, when cameras look as if they would work or as if it would be just something, easily to fix ... and then, it is not I am not an experienced rapairman yet though and still suffering from making a lot of mistakes ... that's what I can live with ... but if I can't find help sometimes and sitting in front of a camera, which is like a pandora box for me ... THAT drives me crazy For example, I have a really beautiful Fujica Six ICS. It looks like it has never been used. Fantastic condition ... except the fact, that the shutter is sticking sometimes. Usually a piece of a cake opening a shutter/lens of a folder ... but I looked at this camera for a hundred times and I have no idea how to do it. Or ... my Samoca Super. Wanted to adjust the rangefinder, but the screws and mechanics inside has been so rotten, that I broke everything just by touching it. So the "Why the hell did I touch it all ?" syndrome would be another good reason for visiting "the couch for camera collectors"
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 9, 2012 5:37:51 GMT -5
Right now 50 bucks US would be too much. I try staying below that for all my purchases.
Interesting. Wouldn't be possible to get a Samoca for 50 bucks here in Japan. Probably one of the reasons, why most vintage japanese cameras are "re-imports" here. Easy to notice, if they are sold with English manual or measuring in feet. I am not sure, but I think, Japan always used the metric system same as Europe. Just the export cameras ( to US ) do have measurings in feet.
|
|