Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2008 15:57:35 GMT -5
OK. Hot on the heels of the cabbage shot, anyone want to take a guess at this scene. Shot with the D300 and f1.8 50mm Nikkor.
|
|
mickeyobe
Lifetime Member
Resident President
Posts: 7,280
|
Post by mickeyobe on May 15, 2008 18:29:45 GMT -5
Picasso?
Mickey
|
|
SidW
Lifetime Member
Posts: 1,107
|
Post by SidW on May 15, 2008 18:33:51 GMT -5
Something left over from that fire?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2008 19:50:39 GMT -5
No, No.
|
|
|
Post by nikkortorokkor on May 16, 2008 4:50:17 GMT -5
Looks to me like a demo site. A sign/billboard was painted on the side of a poured concrete wall, presumably the end of a building. Then another building was slapped up against the wall, partially obscuring the sign. When the interloper was torn down, the remains of the sign were revealed once again. Only, by now, the rest of the sign has weathered away/been removed.
Looking again, the sign was only showing in the attic. The lower part has been stuccoed over. A 60s - 70s job?
Cool shot, I like the details of the bits of leftover tarpaper and joists and the casting marks from the boxing when the concrete was originally poured.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2008 8:41:07 GMT -5
WE HAVE A WINNER! You nailed it exactly. Looks to me like a demo site. A sign/billboard was painted on the side of a poured concrete wall, presumably the end of a building. Then another building was slapped up against the wall, partially obscuring the sign. When the interloper was torn down, the remains of the sign were revealed once again. Only, by now, the rest of the sign has weathered away/been removed. Looking again, the sign was only showing in the attic. The lower part has been stuccoed over. A 60s - 70s job? Cool shot, I like the details of the bits of leftover tarpaper and joists and the casting marks from the boxing when the concrete was originally poured.
|
|