|
Post by nikkortorokkor on Jul 31, 2010 0:47:12 GMT -5
For me, the answer is definitely IIb! I have long wanted to sample the highly regarded Walter Voss Diax - preferably a IIa or IIb, both of which include a built-in rangefinder. The distribution of Diax-products in New-Zealand was organized by T.A. Macalister Ltd, 12 Albert St. Auckland C.1 after having finalised arrangements with Gardener&Salmon (Australia) in 1952 (Australasian Popular Photographer, June 1952) Thus, Diax crop up regularly in New Zealand, but until now I have always been outbid on our local web auction. Finally, I bit the bullet, put heart over common-sense and placed a "must-have" maximum bid on a IIb with the desirable Schneider-Krauznach Xenon f2.0/50mm lens. I paid about 2/3 of what I was prepared to go to in order to reel one in. The camera doesn't disappoint. It's dusty and a little scuffed/corroded but un-dented. The lens is smudgy but clean of fungus and the Synchro Compur shutter actually clicks, though it is very dozy. And the Diax reputation? 1st impressions are that it is well deserved. The IIb is reassuringly heavy and really pleasant to handle; the viewfinder is a little squinty, but good by 50s standards and the rangefinder patch has that magic x-factor which makes focussing a pleasure. The IIb appears to compete well with the Kodak Retina IIa, Agfa Ambi-Silette and Voigtlander Vitessa as queen of the 1950s German mid-price rangefinders. Now I'm looking for the lenses...
|
|
daveh
Lifetime Member
Posts: 4,696
|
Post by daveh on Jul 31, 2010 4:26:01 GMT -5
Someone out there will have Diax lenses. Things like that always seem to be plentiful when you don't want them and then disappear as soon as you are in the market for them. Mike, a challenge for you: photograph next year's rugby world cup winners on film. Will the ABs (All Blacks, the New Zealand team) finish on top of the pile this time round? A nice looking camera. The main problem I have, since my close vision has worsened, is seeing anything at all through the viewfinders (and that is grammatically correct in this case). I note on the Diax website mitglied.multimania.de/fotopete/wsite.html that another model has three separate viewfinders, sporting one for 35mm as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2010 10:54:11 GMT -5
A pretty camera--and one I'm not familiar with.
W.
|
|
|
Post by nikonbob on Jul 31, 2010 16:50:38 GMT -5
I don't think I have seen one of these in the flesh locally. You have to love this site as you got to see a variety of cameras not common in your area. I will have to keep an eye out for one here. Lots of luck getting the whole range of lenses for it.
Bob
|
|
|
Post by nikkortorokkor on Aug 1, 2010 0:53:31 GMT -5
Dave - that's quite a challenge. Luckily, like most Kiwis (New Zealanders), I support 2 teams - the ABs and anyone playing the Wallabies!
Wayne, and Bob, I guess Diax didn't make it to North America. Yes it is a pretty camera - and even prettier in the flesh. Because the shutter hangs off the front, the body is only 30mm (1 3/16") thick but incredibly solid at 750g (26oz). It is definitely a cut above any of the plethora of Braun Paxettes that I own and several cuts above the Leidolf Lordomat. I only really want 2 morelenses the S-K Xenagon 35mm and Tele-Xenar 90mm.
I too enjoy the variety seen here on the Board.
|
|
|
Post by Rachel on Aug 1, 2010 6:05:48 GMT -5
The only Diax camera I have is this simple Diaxette ....
|
|
|
Post by Just Plain Curt on Aug 1, 2010 10:21:26 GMT -5
Mine but for some reason the shutter is acting up.
|
|
|
Post by nikonbob on Aug 1, 2010 21:26:48 GMT -5
I should have known Curt would have one in his stash of cameras.
Bob
|
|