Post by nikkortorokkor on Aug 13, 2011 20:41:38 GMT -5
Whilst culling the camera collection prior to going overseas for work, I passed some of my favourites on to our daughter - an industrial design student in the final year of her degree. She and her boyfriend had already used some of my classics, and seemed to enjoy doing so.
Her eyes lit up at a couple of shelf queens, a Ricoh
and the 'baby' Yashica 44
which I gave to her as future office decorations.
I was quite tickled because these are two of my favourite 'pretty wee cameras'. I know that the Yashi is a shameless crib of the baby Rollei, but it is beguiling nevertheless - and the Richo Auto-35 (little brother to the Richomatic 35 rangefinder) shows just how well-made a plastic point and shoot camera can be:
Intersting that a young designer, born 25 years after the heyday of these cameras, should be so intrigued by them.
By comparison, I was in a big box retailer the other day and, out of curiosity, picked up a low end-Canon DSLR. Now in terms of bang for buck image making ability, the Canon was probably great value for money. But in terms of build quality and design clarity - eugh! It is not a tool that anyone would have great faith in. My 50 dollar MP3 player feels better made, as does my eighty dollar mobile phone. And that isn't a very high bar to climb over.
Some have questioned the wisdom of expensive digital cameras with high build quality and limited purpose - eg The Fuji X100 - (though I know the firmware design of that example leaves something to be desired) - writing them off as exercises in vanity in a technologically volatile market. Well, maybe. Yet watching my daughter and her boyfriend (another young designer) handle and use cameras built around 50 years ago and get a big kick out of doing so, makes me think that for those of us who take photos for fun, spending our money on design quality over features isn't really that bad after all. it is something which will dictate my next choice of camera.
Her eyes lit up at a couple of shelf queens, a Ricoh
and the 'baby' Yashica 44
which I gave to her as future office decorations.
I was quite tickled because these are two of my favourite 'pretty wee cameras'. I know that the Yashi is a shameless crib of the baby Rollei, but it is beguiling nevertheless - and the Richo Auto-35 (little brother to the Richomatic 35 rangefinder) shows just how well-made a plastic point and shoot camera can be:
Intersting that a young designer, born 25 years after the heyday of these cameras, should be so intrigued by them.
By comparison, I was in a big box retailer the other day and, out of curiosity, picked up a low end-Canon DSLR. Now in terms of bang for buck image making ability, the Canon was probably great value for money. But in terms of build quality and design clarity - eugh! It is not a tool that anyone would have great faith in. My 50 dollar MP3 player feels better made, as does my eighty dollar mobile phone. And that isn't a very high bar to climb over.
Some have questioned the wisdom of expensive digital cameras with high build quality and limited purpose - eg The Fuji X100 - (though I know the firmware design of that example leaves something to be desired) - writing them off as exercises in vanity in a technologically volatile market. Well, maybe. Yet watching my daughter and her boyfriend (another young designer) handle and use cameras built around 50 years ago and get a big kick out of doing so, makes me think that for those of us who take photos for fun, spending our money on design quality over features isn't really that bad after all. it is something which will dictate my next choice of camera.