richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 21, 2012 14:58:21 GMT -5
Came across this cartridge at my favorite local canera store.
How long do you figure it's been since George & Co. stamped film type into the cartridge? Notice the endcaps, they pop off like reloadable cartridges.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2012 18:49:10 GMT -5
You forgot to sent the picture. I thin they changed to non reloadable cassettes sometime in the mid 1960s. When I started shooting 35mm in the late 1950s and early '60s they still were reloadable.
W.
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 21, 2012 21:28:15 GMT -5
Tried it again. Get no error message even though it apparently doesn't upload. I'm using a pocket pc, I'll try a table model tomorrow.
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 22, 2012 10:11:03 GMT -5
Can't upload for some reason. Do have a picture of it on rangefinder forum though.
rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1886944#post1886944
|
|
mickeyobe
Lifetime Member
Resident President
Posts: 7,280
|
Post by mickeyobe on May 22, 2012 12:16:48 GMT -5
It must be one of those rare invisible 135 DLC's.
It's not visible on Rangrfinder forum either.
Mickey
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 22, 2012 15:02:18 GMT -5
Think it must be shy. It is uploaded to both rff and flickr both (supposedly) available to everyone yet can only see them when logged in.
The cartridge is embossed with:
"MADE IN ROCHESTER. N.Y. U.S.A.
Kodak
SUPER-XX
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY"
It is all yellow and looks quite similar to the Glenn Goodhandl/ Kodak cartridge of 1935.
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 22, 2012 15:07:22 GMT -5
Workin now (for me). Richard scratches head and shrugs shoulder as he wanders off pondering the imponderable.
|
|
mickeyobe
Lifetime Member
Resident President
Posts: 7,280
|
Post by mickeyobe on May 25, 2012 9:02:44 GMT -5
I wonder why it hid itself.
It almost looks like a pillar from a Roman temple.
Mickey
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 25, 2012 21:21:53 GMT -5
Probably becausenthe first two tries the file size was reduced while the third time the pixel size was reduced.
I've become a bit fixated on that cartridge. Wish there was a hundredth as much information on it as there are on Roman columns... heck, I'd settle on a thousanth as much.
Checked Kodak and information from several patents without luck. There are a couple people online that have extensive Kodak collections that I'll email in hopes of getting some information.
|
|
