PeterW
Lifetime Member
Member has Passed
Posts: 3,804
|
Post by PeterW on Jun 8, 2006 6:29:04 GMT -5
I decided to start listing my cameras by type, and started with the SLRs. I didn't realise I had so many. I thought the list might be of vague interest, so here they are. Got to do the same now with 6x9 folders, 6x6 folders, rangefinders and so on.
Canon A1 Canon AV-1 Canonflex RP Canon FP Canon FX Canon T70 Contaflex IV Contaflex Super Exakta Kine Exakta Varex IIb Fujica ST 605 Mamiya DSX 1000 Mamiya Korvette Mamiya Prismat CPH Olympus OM 10 Praktica BCA Praktica MTL 5 Praktica MTL 5B Praktica Nova 1 Praktica Nova 1B Praktica Super TL 1000 Praktica Super TL 2 Praktica VLC Zenit 11 Zenit 12 XP Zenit 3M Zenit B Zenit C Zenit E Zenit EM
Peter
|
|
|
Post by Randy on Jun 8, 2006 7:52:17 GMT -5
I don't have a Medium Format SLR. I've always wanted one that takes 120 roll film. Can't afford it though.
|
|
PeterW
Lifetime Member
Member has Passed
Posts: 3,804
|
My SLRs
Jun 8, 2006 10:51:19 GMT -5
Post by PeterW on Jun 8, 2006 10:51:19 GMT -5
I forgot one, you reminded me, Randy. How's this for a medium format SLR? It's a Marion Soho, the so-called 'Baby Soho' as most of them were larger format. This one takes pictures 3 1/4 x 2 1/4 inches (6x9 cm) on plates or cut film. It was made by Marion & Co in London, but I think the mirror box was made by for them by Kershaw. It was made for many years in the 1920s and 1930s. The lens is an f/2.9 Ross Xpress, and the focal plane shutter runs from 1 to 1/1000 sec. I was given it by my old Uncle Matt about 20 years ago when he was in his eighties. Matt had been a professional photographer in the 1920s and 1930s specialising in stage work and portraits of theatre personalities and normally used halfplate for this work, but the Baby Soho was his personal camera. When he was in his eighties he found it too bulky and heavy to carry around, and got a 35mm rangefinder. It came in a hard fitted leather case with six double wooden darkslides, six cut film sheaths and a film pack adaptor, all in beautiful condition. Unfortunately my RADA 6x9 roll film adaptor doesn't fit nicely so I've never tried it. Peter
|
|
|
My SLRs
Jun 8, 2006 14:03:48 GMT -5
Post by John Parry on Jun 8, 2006 14:03:48 GMT -5
See you prefer the Prakticas to the canons Peter (LOL) Or is this a reflection on the relative prices!
Regards - John
ps - I'd love to see a shot taken with that Marion Soho - what a show-stopper on the high street!!
|
|
PeterW
Lifetime Member
Member has Passed
Posts: 3,804
|
My SLRs
Jun 8, 2006 16:03:35 GMT -5
Post by PeterW on Jun 8, 2006 16:03:35 GMT -5
Hi John,
Very much the prices!
Peter
|
|
mickeyobe
Lifetime Member
Resident President
Posts: 7,280
|
My SLRs
Jun 8, 2006 23:09:38 GMT -5
Post by mickeyobe on Jun 8, 2006 23:09:38 GMT -5
Marion Soho. That's my kind of camera. It looks like it was treated with plenty of TLC. Mickey
|
|
PeterW
Lifetime Member
Member has Passed
Posts: 3,804
|
Post by PeterW on Jun 9, 2006 5:23:52 GMT -5
It was, Mickey. My Uncle Matt's professional cameras showed signs of hard use, but this one was his personal camera and he treated it with care. I'd like to cut down some 5x4 sheet film to try it out, but I don't have a darkroom any more and cutting down film inside a changing bag isn't very convenient to say the least . In some old photo mags from the 1920s and 1930s you sometimes see a letter from someone who was disappointed with the results from these 'big' SLRs with focal plane shutters, complaining that parts of the negative were 'out of focus'. What they didn't realise, as editors of the time pointed out, is that it's fairly easy to achieve a short exposure by making the slit between the shutter curtains smaller. But the slit takes an appreciable time to travel across the film plane (hence the well-known elongated bodies and oval wheels on moving vehicles) and the camera had to be held steady for the whole time of the slit travel. You had to hold the camera just as steady for a 1/1000 sec exposure as for a 1/100 sec exposure, otherwise you could get someone's feet sharp and their head fuzzy!. This slit travel time was, I undertand, one of the reasons for Zeiss Ikon making its rather complicated metal slat shutter on the Contax travel across the shorter 24mm dimension of the frame intead of the longer 36mm travel of the Leica shutter. Also most, if not all, much later metal blade shutters travel across the shorter rather than the longer dimension of a 24x36 mm frame, so getting a 1/2000 sec exposure is physically easier than with a cloth bind shutter. Peter
|
|
mickeyobe
Lifetime Member
Resident President
Posts: 7,280
|
Post by mickeyobe on Jun 9, 2006 9:53:54 GMT -5
Peter, I have mentioned this before. When I test one of the big cameras up to and including 8x10 I cut enlarging paper to size and rate it at 10 ASA. Total darkness is not absolutely necessary and the processing trays can be covered with newspaper or aluminum foil. I put the resulting paper negative through my scanner and reverse it in Photo Shop. It certainly is makeshift but it works quite well. Mickey
|
|
PeterW
Lifetime Member
Member has Passed
Posts: 3,804
|
My SLRs
Jun 9, 2006 15:57:06 GMT -5
Post by PeterW on Jun 9, 2006 15:57:06 GMT -5
Thanks for reminding me about that Mickey. I have used it in the past but not since I had to give up my darkroom. I was rather spoiled with a proper darkroom.
When it was no longer feasible to have one I gave away all the small equipment - dishes, print driers, printing frames, safelights and so on not thinking I would ever use them again!
But never mind, they went to a good home and no doubt I can cobble up something that's dark enough for that job and find a suitable dish or three.
Peter
|
|