Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2008 14:23:56 GMT -5
Our daughter came over for a visit last weekend and brought Preston, her friend who started out as a cute pup, now weighs 70 lbs and is still growing. Preston likes to run a apparently believes if he works his ears fast enough he might fly. This is when the D300's new focusing system pays off. My old D100 could not have kept Preston in focus on the run. Six frams a sec. helps, too.   |
|
mickeyobe
Lifetime Member
Resident President
Posts: 7,280
|
Post by mickeyobe on Apr 2, 2008 18:21:31 GMT -5
Wayne,
You and Preston have just proved with your new D300 what took Edweard Muybridge back in the 1870's enormous effort and multiple cameras to show the world.
Brilliant.
Mickey
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2008 20:40:10 GMT -5
Probably cost Mybridge more, too--even in 1870 dollars!
|
|
|
|
Post by Randy on Apr 2, 2008 21:54:16 GMT -5
Ahh...youthful exuberance!
|
|
|
|
Post by renaldo on Apr 3, 2008 10:05:44 GMT -5
Beautiful dog and shots. Ah...the D300...a fine camera by all the reports. I looked at them, but when I found the Canon 30D and what came with it at bargain price, I decided to invest in digital slowly.
How about that Nikon D3...that is one nice piece of machinery but way out of my budget. And the Marks from Canon are even more expensive.
Me and my 8mp Canon 30D will get along just fine!
Does anyone remember the Canon D30...yes that is correct...D30. It was Canon's first entry into the digital SLR and was a 3mp.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2008 12:53:43 GMT -5
The 30D is a fine camera. The Nikon lenses I already had were the only thing that pointed me that direction.
The D3 and the full frame Canon DSLRs are to big and heavy for my taste. The D300 is heavy enough.
|
|
