|
|
Post by conan on Nov 11, 2016 3:21:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by raybar on Nov 12, 2016 0:43:26 GMT -5
They don't offer any evidence that this particular camera is the oldest surviving Nikon. Even if it is, how could they know that without searching the entire planet? Articles like this should say "oldest known," rather than making a claim of "oldest" that they can't prove.
Even so, if I were a billionaire, I might bid on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by belgiumreporter on Nov 13, 2016 15:21:59 GMT -5
If i had the money i'd probably buy it, but for now my aim is to one day get a SP as they are more usable than the early S types.
|
|
|
|
Post by conan on Nov 19, 2016 13:38:12 GMT -5
If i had the money i'd probably buy it, but for now my aim is to one day get a SP as they are more usable than the early S types. An SP is on my list when I win some money and judging by the price of them I need to win quite a few dollars. Some years ago I had the pleasure of using an M3 and SP for several months’ side by side and both had their particular strengths. I liked the SP a little more possibly because it felt so much like a Nikon F which of course is no surprise given the heritage of the F. |
|
