|
Post by belgiumreporter on Jan 29, 2017 10:05:10 GMT -5
Can a 10 year old pentax dslr image quality wise be compared to a "new" nikon 7100 ? It's an unfair competition, but since i've got both cameras i was curious just how they would compare,maybe some of you do to? Both DX cameras equipped with standard original(manual) 50mm lenses, aperture priority/200iso highest quality Jpeg settings. ![](http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj526/f2francois/DSC_3512_zpswdwxkygh.jpg) Pentax K100D and nikon D7100 ![](http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj526/f2francois/_IGP6988_zpstln6kgdt.jpg) The scene Compared at the same crop: ![](http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj526/f2francois/DSC_5969_zpslmpzxryx.jpg) ![](http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj526/f2francois/_IGP6990_zpsthnloten.jpg) out of focus image of the pentax, focussing wide open is trial and error ![](http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj526/f2francois/DSC_5970_zpsrwtflqdd.jpg) ![](http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj526/f2francois/_IGP6989_zps7zjicrjq.jpg) In the right conditions the pentax performs as well as the nikon but those right conditions rarely occur. There's no competition AF speed, high iso, writing speed,max buffer, shooting rate and a lot of things i probably forgot to check, but i guess that's obvious, but those 2 shots at f11 do look very much the same don't they? The pentax has cost me 50euros with takumar 50 1:1.8 the 7100 body only, some ten times more. I just realised this post is in the wrong topic, sorry for that !
|
|