Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Feb 9, 2012 0:31:43 GMT -5
I am not 100% sure, but I think, that is exactly what causes Waynes "ghost images". The object ( or mostly person ) will be continiously exposed and then again by the flash. If it moves ( or even just the camera ), you'll get those kind of ghosts. People use this as an artistic effect sometimes, but using a pretty low ISO then. Long exposure times, wildly panning around and firing the flash. The result looks a little bit like a multi-exposure, pretty cool sometimes at a party or club for example.
The problem have been focal plane shutters, which usually just allow you to use 1/60 sec in combination with a flash. I just use older cameras with leaf shutters. Leaf shutters allow you to synchronize the flash at all shutter speeds and 1/125 sec works often better ... in cases, you don't want ghosts on your pictures.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Feb 8, 2012 9:53:19 GMT -5
Fill-in flash techniques are probably one of the most complicated things in photography ... at least for me. Brightening dark objects BUT still getting a natural look of the picture is not really easy I experimented a lot with bouncing techniques, but that can be quite tricky as well, if you don't know exactly, how the light will be reflected by different surfaces. Recently, I use more straight flash again. It works better for me, but the trick is the right combination of ISO and flash power. Talking about your example picture, what you ( might ) want is "keeping the natural light and mood in the area of the bed and window" but lighting the lady a little bit more up. I have never seen a camera automatic, which could manage that properly but it is actually not that difficult. It just need a few tries though. Indoors, I would go for ISO 800 on digital and 400 ASA for film, 1/125 sec is fine ( it case, somebody moves ), aperture adjusted to the light conditions ... and just a tick of flash. Most photographers I know, are working completely manually ( flash and camera settings ). That works actually best.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Feb 6, 2012 9:15:23 GMT -5
Nice poem. Love it !!! ;D
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Feb 6, 2012 9:14:18 GMT -5
I am not old enough for being able to have started with ancient technologies like pinhole cameras, but from what I discovered by using vintage cameras later, there is actually less technology required for taking a good photograph ... and that lets me often question the necessity of all those often complicated and sophisticated high tech stuff, we are using now.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Feb 5, 2012 19:00:29 GMT -5
Unusual cold winter here in Japan. No snow in Tokyo, but that's just a geographical matter. Our island has mountains in the middle, so just the north-west side is blessed with snow. The clouds can not pass the mountains to the other side. But the winter in Europe has been mostly mild, as I heard from my mother. So, it seems, that the gulf stream is still working. I don't want to bring up "global warming" as a topic and frankly speaking, I don't know enough about it for discussing it properly, but just from my feeling, the climate became more extreme. Much snow during the last two winters in Germany ( as my friends and family told me ) and I never experienced much snow during the 40 years, I have lived there in the past ... and I lived close to Duesseldorf, where the weather is very similar to the UK. But also here in Japan. My wife told me, the average temperatures in summer have been about 28 C, but in the last two summers, the temperature didn't drop under the 30 C mark for three months. Not even for one single day and not even at night. Also "classic seasons" disappeared. Not much rain during the classic rainy season in June and there hasn't been any real spring during the last two years. From winter to summer in one week. Big coat or t-shirt ... nothing in between. However ... what I always appreciated about the weather in Japan, is it's continuity. The temperature is not changing rapidly within days or weeks as I remember it from Europe. When it becomes summer here ( usually after the "Golden Week" at the beginning of May ), you don't need a jacket until November and usually, the plum trees start blooming already at the end of January ... but not this year. No sign of a blossom yet. That was the meteorological report from Japan
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Feb 4, 2012 20:51:05 GMT -5
That also came into my mind, when I read the first post. According to the almighty Wikipedia, the first war, which has been photographed, was the Mexican-American War in 1847.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Feb 3, 2012 5:34:14 GMT -5
I am also not submerged into the world of smartphones yet, but it might be useful for others
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Feb 1, 2012 1:14:02 GMT -5
BTW ... the most popular camera, used by war photographers at that time, has been the Nikon F, I think.
Good luck with your project ... and maybe also interesting to research, if there have been pictures taken by the Vietnam people as well.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 31, 2012 22:57:58 GMT -5
I am not sure, if there has been a particular type of camera used during the Vietnam war. Basically all type of cameras, available at that time. A friend of mine for example told me, that he used an old Minolta SLR when he was in Vietnam, but I think, the military personnel ( basically just GIs bringing their own private cameras to the battlefield ) might have used a wide range of different cameras. Comparing to WWII, more "ordinary people" owned an own camera, indicated by the fact, you already mentioned ... more pictures have been taken. So if you just research, what cameras have been released by different makers during or let's say up to five years before the war, you should have your answer. And there should also be Veteran meetings as well, especially in the US. You might just try to be very sensitive, because pictures from any war do usually not only show nice things. The most spectacular ones are most likely already published ... and the actually most interesting ones will never be
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 31, 2012 19:13:05 GMT -5
That is a cute model !!!
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 29, 2012 18:48:57 GMT -5
Wow ... where do such beautiful birds sit on trees
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 29, 2012 18:47:12 GMT -5
Thanks Rachel ... that one is cheaper ... and the shipping as well. Thanks a lot !!!
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 29, 2012 18:43:05 GMT -5
Thanks a lot. I might have found something: www.paramountcords.com/custom.aspA little bit pricy, but at least a possibility. Special photo accessories are not cheap anyway I need to think about it.
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 29, 2012 10:10:21 GMT -5
Yeah ... it works !!! Shot a first test film, using Daves film container today. I just used a simple Kodak Gold 100, but it seems, that my first try in emulating Bolta sized film has been successful Funny little camera too. Will certainly use it again. I am just sorry for my crappy scanner ( it's a real bad one and I am bad in scanning as well ), but I didn't want to wait until I will get my next package of films scanned properly. I am just happy Thanks a lot Dave for having made this possible !!! Berndt
|
|
Berndt
Lifetime Member
Posts: 751
|
Post by Berndt on Jan 29, 2012 8:08:27 GMT -5
Mickey,
and where did you get those ? I asked in the biggest camera store here in Tokyo ( actually the biggest in the world, I think ) ... and they have never heard of it.
It would be okay, if I would get such an adapter online as well, but how do I need to search for it ?
Berndt
|
|