richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 29, 2012 16:40:18 GMT -5
Hello, new people, new cameras, new ideas are always welcome.
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 26, 2012 11:39:23 GMT -5
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 25, 2012 21:21:53 GMT -5
Probably becausenthe first two tries the file size was reduced while the third time the pixel size was reduced.
I've become a bit fixated on that cartridge. Wish there was a hundredth as much information on it as there are on Roman columns... heck, I'd settle on a thousanth as much.
Checked Kodak and information from several patents without luck. There are a couple people online that have extensive Kodak collections that I'll email in hopes of getting some information.
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 25, 2012 21:08:51 GMT -5
Looks like you were within spittin distance of where O'Sullivan was set up Wayne.
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 25, 2012 13:48:15 GMT -5
Not quite that old yet though I oaccasionally feel that way. :-)
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 25, 2012 13:04:18 GMT -5
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 22, 2012 15:07:22 GMT -5
Workin now (for me). Richard scratches head and shrugs shoulder as he wanders off pondering the imponderable.
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 22, 2012 15:02:18 GMT -5
Think it must be shy. It is uploaded to both rff and flickr both (supposedly) available to everyone yet can only see them when logged in.
The cartridge is embossed with:
"MADE IN ROCHESTER. N.Y. U.S.A. Kodak SUPER-XX EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY"
It is all yellow and looks quite similar to the Glenn Goodhandl/ Kodak cartridge of 1935.
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 22, 2012 10:11:03 GMT -5
Can't upload for some reason. Do have a picture of it on rangefinder forum though.
rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1886944#post1886944
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 21, 2012 21:28:15 GMT -5
Tried it again. Get no error message even though it apparently doesn't upload. I'm using a pocket pc, I'll try a table model tomorrow.
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 21, 2012 14:58:21 GMT -5
Came across this cartridge at my favorite local canera store.
How long do you figure it's been since George & Co. stamped film type into the cartridge? Notice the endcaps, they pop off like reloadable cartridges.
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 15, 2012 11:51:04 GMT -5
thank you all for the welcome.
Wayne
This Argus is an engineers nightmare. There isn't one part of it that's square to another. Funny things happen on the way to the basebard though and by the time the image has meandered it's way down to the paper all the wobbles have canceled each other out and the negative prints just fine.
|
|
richl
Contributing Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by richl on May 14, 2012 18:56:09 GMT -5
Been reading here for a while and decided it was about time to say hello.
I have three ridged equipment purchasing requirements and keep to them strictly. Said requirements being "Because I like it.", it has to function or be repairable and I won't pay premium collector prices. That said, for the most part I am drawn to first of it's kind cameras though I'm not at all picky on serial numbers or the like that 'serious' collectors go for.
I have an Argus model A along with the Model A enlarger that used the camera for it's lens. I also have a Mec16 SB (First camera with ttl metering) a Retina 117 (First camera designed specifically for the Kodak daylight loading cartridge.) a Duo-620 (first camera produced by the former Nagel Camera Woks after being purchased by E.K.). There are several other cameras in the collection as well but I'll mention those in the various boards related to them.
Good day to y'all Rich L
|
|